a5c7b9f00b In the wake of Spock's ultimate deed of sacrifice, Admiral Kirk and the Enterprise crew return to Earth for some essential repairs to their ship. When they arrive at Spacedock, they are shocked to discover that the Enterprise is to be decommissioned. Even worse, Dr. McCoy begins acting strangely and Scotty has been reassigned to another ship. Kirk is forced to steal back the Enterprise and head across space to the Genesis Planet to save Spock and bring him to Vulcan. Unknown to them, the Klingons are planning to steal the secrets of the Genesis Device for their own deadly purpose. Admiral Kirk's defeat of Khan Noonien Singh and the creation of the Genesis Planet are empty victories. Mr. Spock is dead and Dr. McCoy is, seemingly inexplicably, being driven insane. Then an unexpected visit from Spock's father provides a startling revelation: McCoy is harboring Spock's living essence. With one friend alive and one not, but both in pain, Kirk attempts to help his friends by stealing the Enterprise and defying Starfleet's Genesis quarantine. However, the Klingons have also learned of the Genesis Device and race to meet Kirk in a deadly rendezvous. WRITER: Harve Bennett. DIRECTOR: Leonard Nimoy. THEATRICAL RELEASE: June 1, 1984. BUDGET ESTIMATE: $17 million. USA BOX OFFICE: $76 million. WORLDWIDE BOX OFFICE: $87 million. <br/><br/>THE PLOT: Kirk and Co. disobey Federation orders by stealing the Enterprise from space dock (!!) and heading for the forbidden Genesis Planet (created in the previous film) to retrieve Spock's body and clash with Commander Kruge, a Klingon bent on claiming the secrets of the Genesis Project for his own destructive purposes. <br/><br/>COMMENT: For a 1984 film I admit that the Genesis Planet sets aren't the greatest, but they get the job done. Besides, if you're used to watching the TV episodes they're fantastic. Star Trek was never about outstanding special effects anyway (with the exception of the unique and brilliant "Star Trek: The Motion Picture"); no, Star Trek is about people, their joy of living and their grand spirit of adventure and exploration. <br/><br/>GREAT LINE: Witnessing the emblazed ship go down on the apocalyptic horizon of the Genesis Plane, Kirk asks: "My God, Bones, what have I done?" McCoy responds: "What you HAD to do, Jim, what you ALWAYS do – turn death into a fighting chance to live." <br/><br/>QUESTION: Just how far does the Saavik (Robin Curtis) go in helping the teenage Spock get through his first Vulcan "pon farr" on the Genesis Planet? The film itself doesn't concretely answer, it simply shows Saavik holding Spock's hand and comforting him. However, since early drafts of "Star Trek IV" featured Saavik remaining on Vulcan because she was pregnant with Spock's child, we can assume that Saavik went ALL THE WAY in helping young Spock (!). Okay, so now the question is: Did she do this out of a sense of Vulcan duty or simply to get her jollies with a young Vulcan stud? <br/><br/>Speaking of Robin Curtis, she plays Saavik much more Vulcan-like (i.e. better) than Kirstie Alley in "The Wrath of Khan" (I never bought Alley as a Vulcan). In truth, Curtis in nothing less than exceptional in this film. <br/><br/>COMMENT: Although early in the story Sarek describes Spock's 'katra' as his "living spirit" and later Kirk refers to it as his "soul," it's clear in the the film that the katra does not refer to spirit or soul in the traditional sense, i.e. one's non-physical life-essence. We know this because, while McCoy possesses Spock's katra, the Vulan's actual consciousness or life-essence is simultaneously within his rapidly-aging regenerating body on the Genesis Planet. Hence, the katra could be accurately described as an incorporeal file of a Vulcan's knowledge and life, which is why Sarek described it as "everything (Spock) knew, everything he was." <br/><br/>FYI: I never bought Merritt Butrick as Kirk's son, David, but he's serviceable. He died of AIDS in 1989 at the young age of 29. <br/><br/>ANALYSIS: "The Search for Spock" is a great Star Trek picture embellished by the welcome return of Trek's quirky brand of humor. The story expertly meshes comedic touches with dead-serious tragedy. It's also thoroughly enjoyable and compelling to see Kirk & crew in the wry and unexpected role of Starfleet rebels, risking everything to honor their fallen comrade. Another highlight is the return of Klingons as major villains, with upgraded make-up no less. <br/><br/>The only problem with this Trek installment is revealed in the title – there's no Spock, at least as we know him, but the film does a fabulous job of instilling a sense of the Vulcan's lingering presence. The story climaxes with the powerful image of Spock's mates warmly gathering together. This scene is worth the wait where a simple raised eyebrow fills the viewer with incredible warmth and joy (not to mention the shedding of a few tears). <br/><br/>Also, I gotta hand it to the creators for coming up with an inspired and (seemingly) credible way of resurrecting Spock; the Genesis Project was, by happenstance, the perfect catalyst. <br/><br/>FINAL WORD: "Star Trek III" is inexplicably condemned by fundamentalist trekkers as a failure or, at best, mediocre. <br/><br/>They're wrong. I never liked this segment and the new viewing doesn't change anything: it's dull and flat as all rescue stories. It's a galactic Baywatch, without the"talent" of Pamela! If Davis is a fine substitute for Saavik and "Doc" the best Klingon ever, the magic of Trek eludes me there.<br/><br/>The audio commentary says that in a trilogy, the middle part is always the weakest or hardest because the audience loses the excitement of the original surprise and lacks the pleasure of the ending climax. Well, i remember to have seen excellent "Part II" movies: Back to the future, Superman, Empire strikes back, War of the clones, Aliens! Here, I think the explanation comes the empty seat for Spock that tells a lot of the importance of the character. Thus my reluctance to see next generation, explorer, deep space, enterprise shows and my pleasure to go to the revamping of the original series in 2009.<br/><br/>That's makes me aware of a strange fact: as a child or a teen, we never went to a Trek movie in spite my parents are really cool about movies. But it's true than in France, Trek haven't the same glamor than Star Wars, maybe because the merchandising was quite nonexistent. I discovered Trek, show and movies, with the defunct TV channel "La Cinq" thus around the beginning of the nineties that's is to say the end of this wonderful story of filmmaking.<br/><br/>Thus, just Warp 10 to ST 4 ! Star Trek III: The Search for Spock isn't really a movie, it's a happy reunion. The Enterprise is 18 years older and the crew members look like Gray Panthers in space. It may be old stuff, but it's still the right stuff up there. [8 June 1984, p.23] Admiral James T Kirk (<a href="/name/nm0000638/">William Shatner</a>) commandeers the newly repaired USS Enterprise in order to return to the Genesis and retrieve Spock's body after Spock's father Sarek (<a href="/name/nm0501697/">Mark Lenard</a>) informs him that the body must be returned to Vulcan so that it can be re-united with Spock's katra (eternal soul), which Spock has conveniently stored in the body of Dr Leonard McCoy (<a href="/name/nm0001420/">DeForest Kelley</a>). Meanwhile, on Genesis, Saavik (<a href="/name/nm0193495/">Robin Curtis</a>) and David (<a href="/name/nm0125190/">Merritt Butrick</a>) have located a youthful Spock, but the three of them are marooned on the planet's unstable surface when a Klingon warbird in search of the Genesis device destroys their ship, the USS Grissom, before they can be beamed aboard. The Enterprise must contend with ruthless Klingon commander Kruge (<a href="/name/nm0000502/">Christopher Lloyd</a>) while attempting to rescue the survivors before the Genesis planet collapses. The crew is all here. Kirk, McCoy, Spock (<a href="/name/nm0000559/">Leonard Nimoy</a>), chief engineer Montgomery "Scotty" Scott (<a href="/name/nm0001150/">James Doohan</a>), communications officer Lt Uhura (<a href="/name/nm0629667/">Nichelle Nichols</a>), first officer Pavel Chekov (<a href="/name/nm0000479/">Walter Koenig</a>), helmsman Hikaru Sulu (<a href="/name/nm0001786/">George Takei</a>), Lt Saavik and Kirk's son David. In the year 2285 A.D., about three months after the events of the previous film The Wrath of Khan. In fact, the movie opens with the final scenes from The Wrath of Khan. Possibly, but there was no guarantee that they would have gotten all the Klingons before at least one of their own number was lost, since the Klingons outnumbered them and were likely have better firearms training. In the novelization, Kirk actually does consider the possibility of trying to shoot the Klingons as they beam in, but quickly dismisses it on the grounds that they'd likely damage the transporter in the process, which would have stranded him and his crew on the Enterprise since Starfleet had already removed all the shuttlecraft (escape pods had not been conceived of at this point in the franchise's history, first being mentioned in the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation). The real problem was that the Enterprise's control system had burned out during the battle with the Klingons, meaning that after killing the landing party, Kirk and his crew would have had no other way of defending themselves. After realizing that his landing party was dead, Kruge may well have beamed Kirk and his crew into his brig or dumped them on the Genesis planet, after which he would have been free to steal the valuable Federation data in the Enterprise's computer banks (which is what the self-destruct was really intended to prevent). The decision was likely also affected by the knowledge that this allowed the Enterprise a "noble death" rather than the decommissioning she faced when returned to Earth. The Star Trek series didn't really get its timeline sorted out until the late 1980s and early '90s (and even then TOS era dates are still a bit muddled); the 20 years figure is a rough guess based on the fact that the Trek series had been going for just under 20 years when the movie was made. The closest on-screen explanation we have is that either Morrow is simply wrong about the figure, or he means that 20 years have passed since the Enterprise was refitted in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. There are other issues. In the first pilot (which was non-canonical before any "regular" series episodes had been created), Spock was shown as first officer under Christopher Pike, 5 to 10 years earlier. Clearly, the Enterprise is more than 20 years old. The Federation would not build expensive "wessels" with such a short service life. ["The Menagerie"/"The Cage" were non-canonical from the get-go, as they describe interstellar travel using conventional propulsion systems, a gross improbability. If such a ship could reach 0.9c, and Talos IV were 200 light-years away, the trip would have had to begun in the early 21st century, at the latest. Enterprise (the series) rendered the implicit non-canonicity explicit. There was no room in the Enterprise universe for Christopher Pike and his ship.] It was slightly redressed to serve as the bridge of the Grissom, with the seat covers and a few of the screen details being changed. The lighting of the set might also have been adjusted to give it a different color than we'd seen before. The Excelsior got a new, albeit very rudimentary, bridge set that was scrapped after this movie. The next time we see it in Star Trek VI, it has a redressed version of the Enterprise-A bridge. The novelization answers this (though it's technically non-canon and certain parts of the novelization don't match up perfectly with the film). Uhura stayed behind to scramble Federation communications and make it impossible for anyone to catch up with the Enterprise until it was too late to stop them from completing their mission. At the last moment, with authorities banging on the door of the transporter room, Uhura beamed herself to the gate of the Vulcan embassy to attempt to gain an audience with Ambassador Sarek. Just as a Federation security team was almost upon her, she finally negotiated her way past the gate and ran through the grounds to the front door of the embassy. Knocking, she received no answer, and the security team's leader began leading her back outside the embassy grounds before Sarek appeared and demanded to know why the Federation was invading Vulcan sovereign territory. The security team leader, realizing she'd overstepped her grounds, stated that Starfleet believed the Enterprise crew to be sick and were trying to get them to treatment, but Sarek denied her permission to leave the embassy grounds with Uhura, stating that the commander had asked for, and been granted, sanctuary. Declining the security officer's offer of 10 minutes alone with Sarek followed by incarceration, Uhura accepted his offer of sanctuary. The security officer said that the Federation would be asking for extradition. "That is up to your government," Sarek replies. "Good day."<br/><br/>However, for the sake of the story & it's pacing, it can likely be assumed that Uhura has plenty of connections and resources that would allow for her to find some sort of transport to Vulcan. If you watch the way she handles her fellow officer ("Mr Adventure") just as Kirk & his team enter the transporter room, it's reasonable to assume she can handle the problem of getting to Vulcan without the script saying so. As Genesis explodes, Kirk and his skeleton crew fly the Klingon warbird to Vulcan, where the Vulcan high priestess T'Lar (<a href="/name/nm0000752/">Judith Anderson</a>) performs the dangerous ritual, fal tor pan, that reunites Spock's katra with his body. The procedure is successful, but Spock's memory is slow to return, and Sarek isn't sure when or if it will come back. "Only time will tell," he tells Kirk. As Spock, clad in a white robe, T'Lar, and a number of attending Vulcans leave the ceremonial platform, Spock walks past Kirk, not recognizing his presence at first. Suddenly, Spock turns to Kirk and asks if the ship is out of danger, to which Kirk replies that he (Spock) saved them all. In the final scene, Spock says, 'Jim. Your name is Jim, while the crew of the Enterprise gather around him, pleased that his memory is beginning to return. Yes. Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, a novelization of the movie by American science fiction writer Vonda N. McIntyre, was released in 1984. So far, there are 13. Star Trek: The Search for Spock was preceded by <a href="/title/tt0079945/">Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)</a> (1979) and <a href="/title/tt0084726/">Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan (1982)</a> (1982). It was followed by <a href="/title/tt0092007/">Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)</a> (1986), <a href="/title/tt0098382/">Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)</a> (1989), and <a href="/title/tt0102975/">Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991)</a> (1991), all of which featured the Enterprise captained by James T Kirk. <a href="/title/tt0111280/">Star Trek: Generations (1994)</a> (1994) united Kirk's crew with the crew of the Enterprise captained by Jean-Luc Picard. The Star Trek movies featuring Picard as captain include: <a href="/title/tt0117731/">Star Trek: First Contact (1996)</a> (1996), <a href="/title/tt0120844/">Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)</a> (1998), and <a href="/title/tt0253754/">Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)</a> (2002). <a href="/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek (2009)</a> (2009), <a href="/title/tt1408101/">Star Trek: Into Darkness (2013)</a> (2013), and <a href="/title/tt2660888/">Star Trek: Beyond (2016)</a> (2016) harken to an alternate reality in which Kirk was just beginning his career with Starfleet Academy. While we never actually see it the answer seems almost certainly yes. Spock is experiencing the "Pon-Farr", the Vulcan mating drive which it is established in the original series will kill him if he does not have sex with a Vulcan female. We then see Saavik touch their hands together in the first phase of the mating ritual. In the script for Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, the matter is verified by revealing that Saavik's reason for staying on Vulcan is that she is pregnant with Spock's child but the line was cut from the final film. It was an experimental warp drive that was to be tested on the Excelsior, the first Federation ship outfitted with it. Simply put, it was a warp drive that was faster than any warp drive in use up to that point. The Star Trek lore says that the experiment was a failure, not because of Scotty's sabotage but because Federation scientists couldn't make it work. David Marcus admits to Saavik that he'd used a substance called protomatter in his engineering of the Genesis device. Saavik tells him that he knew himself that protomatter was a highly unstable substance. Like he says, it "helped solve certain fundamental problems" but it also doomed the Genesis experiment to fail—since it caused the rapid development and aging of Genesis itself and the planet destroyed itself. Furthermore, the device was not used as originally intended. It was supposed to have been used on an existing lifeless planet but in this case it created a planet out of the light elements present in the Mutara Nebula, which would not have have the necessary heavy elements needed for planet formation. Shazam! in hindi 720ptamil movie Episode 1.250 free downloadEpisode 3.15 in hindi free downloadToo Much Speed full movie hd 1080p downloadTexas Karmageddon in tamil pdf downloadfree download The FirmDragon Ball GT tamil dubbed movie downloadI Am Number Four movie free download hdThe Last of Us: Part II full movie free downloadJumanji: Welcome to the Jungle download movie free
Action and adventurous movies are my favorite ones that I used to watch. Here in the forum, they also mention freestanding fireplace about such a movie. The movie Star Trek III: The Search for Spock is a 1984 released adventure movie.
Dayretinrey Admin replied
345 weeks ago